Sunday, August 28, 2005

Dream

An awful movie ran through my head twice while I heaped criticism on the no-talent woman who wrote it. Then I woke up and realized, to my chagrin, that since I dreamt it, I’m the fool who wrote it.

In the dream, the woman is that actress from that French movie, “Ni pour ni contre,” with that same timid but secretly clever look on her face. She is a low-level reporter who works at a reporting station feeding wired news from one terminal into the other, and her more experienced coworker is Sanjukta, my friend from Bangkok (who is in the dream as she is in real life: beautiful, worldly, smart, and demanding).

A wire comes in from “IFS” that thermal underwear is banned in some country for safety reasons. The main woman, let’s call her Nini, processes the incoming story but finds it quickly retracted and suppressed. “What’s the import?” she asks Sanjukta, who explains that movie directors use thermal underwear for their actors, who must work in a wide range of conditions, and thermals breathe well so can protect against both extreme heat and cold. Why did IFS retract it? That remains a mystery.

Nini quits reporting and turns the suppressed story into a movie so the public can find out about the truth. I see this movie on TV and note that she’s the writer, director, and lead actress, and in the story she’s made her character, the intercepting reporter, crucial to the plot. That’s in poor taste, I note. I only see the last bit of the movie, where her lover (played by her romantic interest in the real-world French movie) who works for the authorities but is in fact the renegade thermals smuggler, has colluded with a rough-looking airplane mechanic to make the shipment. In the final scene they’re hand-carting an airplane (in the dream world, this is normal), with the mechanic steering inside and the boyfriend leading a team of men down below. He knows she is leaving (for reporting duties? to tell the truth? in disgust, because she is really me and knows the movie sucks?) and looks up into the sky for that reason, although she is leaving by foot rather than by plane, but in that moment of distraction the airplane falls on him and he dies, and maybe the mechanic dies, too. The credits come up over our protagonist fallen on the floor in grief, with a ridiculously melodramatic expression on her face, and a tacky script font crediting her, “D’angelou Francais” if I read and remember it right, for writing, directing, and starring in the thing.

In inexplicable dream chronology, Benni takes the role of the worldwise friend (mine) and is now at the set of the making of movie. I warn her the movie sucks but know she’ll form her own opinion. Meanwhile I’ve changed the channel and see another movie just beginning. Then I realize it’s the same story begun halfway through, and am annoyed that Nini’s stretched her plot scrap to three hours: a movie and its sequel. What I saw earlier was the end of the sequel, which I’m about to see again. At the making-of, the movie technicians, the same muscly men who drag the plane, do their editing in a room of computers, and even their screen savers are stupid, I note: it’s the tropical fish scene but the umbrellafish has a cartoon face and does a vaudeville dance. The love interest is again making plans with the mechanic. I need to leave, because I can’t bear to see the tragic crap unfold. Benni gives me the exit route: I have to walk through vast expanses of Middle East desert as well as the huge party celebrating the movie’s success, which has multiple rooms separating men, single women, and married women (dream-consistent as the love interest looks French-Arabic, the underwear-banning country is in Muslim Africa, and the movie is filmed on location. Probably the crew is wearing the banned thermals to protect against extreme heat and cold.) As I’m hurriedly walking, I can read the final pages of the script in my mind; abrupt changes in format confirm its stupidity. The script becomes a novel for a few paragraphs, and then a childish open letter: “Here is my script, Daddy! I hope you like it. Let the girl sing her song.” and then a final few pages of dialogue back in novel form, and the plane falls on the boyfriend, and the girlfriend makes a face, and she’s an idiot, and I wake up at 4:30 in the morning and I’m the idiot, and dream-inexplicably, I have to write it all down.

Saturday, August 06, 2005

Priorities

The environmental impact of driving is bigger than that of waste, according to the BBC's Open University. With all this new insight, I can stop contemplating driving to the recycling center (I think it's still worth it if you're doing a big move-out and have lots of errands to run, e.g. goodwill).

The site also calls to our attention the inevitable, hidden waste/packaging/effort involved in getting any kind of good to the consumer. So, with or without obvious packaging, waste is waste: the plastic wrap of a cookie I actually ate may represent less waste than the bag of carrots I threw away because it went bad.

Useful perspective. Meanwhile, I'll work on driving less.

Friday, August 05, 2005

Plastics recycling: a sham?

I'm trying to be a better person. I haven't given up just yet.

With the exception of a few inherited containers, all my "tupperware" consists of saved plastic tubs from various groceries. I thought that if I got too much I could simply recycle them. However, nearly all these tubs are #5 or #6 plastic, and these aren't recycled in Ann Arbor, nor anywhere else, for all practical purposes. I noticed that lots of packaged fresh fruits and vegetables can come in either #1 or #6 plastics. Indignant, I wondered: why use #6 at all, when it isn't in practice recyclable?

Which led me to the tangled world of plastics recycling. I'll put the take-home message below, and then some links which I hope you'll find time to read.

- - -
Moral: RECYCLING IS A second-to-LAST RESORT. Waste is waste. Think of every plastic item as a mess to clean up that will leave permanent stains, no matter what. It is a zillion times better not to make the mess in the first place.

There's a tremendous difference between recycled and recyclable. Anything's recyclable in theory; in practice it depends on economics. If we buy plastic without restraint because we think curbside recycling lets us off the hook, our net impact is to make more mess. If we buy recyclED products, we help create a market for recycling, and thus help clean up.

Note it is far from obvious where, if anywhere, to find post-consumer recycled plastic products on your typical store shelves. Plastic recycling is growing but very limited; US food/drink-bearing plastic is virgin plastic, never post-consumer, and the more of that we buy the more demand we create, and the more permanent mess we have to deal with.
- - -

Berkeley's Ecology Center provides an eye-opener and good starting point on misconceptions about plastics recycling. Compare to the industry spin.

In more ways than one, plastics are here to stay, so now what? For pragmatic advice, see the Ecology Center article above or London-based greenchoices.org.

More overviews on the economics of plastic recycling are provided by the packaging industry and a UK waste agency. Recoup.org seems aimed at business/government more than personal consumers, providing a list of potential uses of post-consumer plastic.

- - -
Towards the infinite epilogue:

I've e-mailed Recycle Ann Arbor to ask (again) if it's true they don't take #6 plastic, as they told me on the phone). Because they do take #6 "foam." Polystyrene is polystyrene, what's the diff? Is this just a misunderstanding? If I hear back from them, I'll let you know. But I can still start a campaign against yogurt and hummus tubs (#5 plastic, nonrecyclable).

Meanwhile several of my #6's are recycled as planters on my windowsill; I'm trying to get some jade and vine cuttings to take root, inspired by Benni's plantiness.